🎉 Hey Gate Square friends! Non-stop perks and endless excitement—our hottest posting reward events are ongoing now! The more you post, the more you win. Don’t miss your exclusive goodies! 🚀
🆘 #Gate 2025 Semi-Year Community Gala# | Square Content Creator TOP 10
Only 1 day left! Your favorite creator is one vote away from TOP 10. Interact on Square to earn Votes—boost them and enter the prize draw. Prizes: iPhone 16 Pro Max, Golden Bull sculpture, Futures Vouchers!
Details 👉 https://www.gate.com/activities/community-vote
1️⃣ #Show My Alpha Points# | Share your Alpha points & gains
Post your
Recently, expectations in the financial markets regarding the Fed potentially lowering interest rates have been rising. However, Seema Shah, Chief Global Strategist at Principal Asset Management, has raised a point worth following. She believes that while the current economic environment seems to provide some reasons for easing monetary policy, there is not a sufficiently strong economic basis to support a substantial rate cut of 50 basis points.
Shah pointed out that if the Fed chooses such aggressive interest rate cuts, it may raise doubts in the market about the motivation behind the decision. Market participants may interpret this move as influenced by political factors rather than a decision based on objective economic data. This perception could lead to rising inflation expectations and an increase in long-term yields, thereby increasing the risk of a market correction.
Regarding the market's general expectation of a 25 basis point rate cut in September, Shah believes it may receive a positive response from the market. However, she warns that if the rate cut exceeds this level, it could have the opposite effect. This viewpoint highlights the complex situation the Fed faces in formulating monetary policy: responding to market expectations while ensuring the independence and effectiveness of policy decisions.
In the current economic environment, every move made by the Fed is closely followed. Decision-makers need to find a balance between stimulating economic growth and maintaining financial stability. Shah's perspective provides us with an important viewpoint, reminding us to focus on the economic fundamentals rather than merely following market sentiment.
As the global economic situation continues to change, the policy direction of the Fed will remain a focal point of market attention. Investors and analysts will closely follow future economic data and statements from Fed officials in search of clues that may influence monetary policy decisions.