To truly understand a project, you need to understand what it brings compared to its competitors.



For years, institutions like SACEM (France), BMI (USA), and YouTube CMS have dominated copyright and royalty management.

But their systems are outdated, full of high fees, lack of transparency, and slow processes.

@campnetworkxyz introduces a whole new paradigm, every piece of content becomes a programmable onchain asset, with attribution, licensing, and royalties built in from the start.

Many of you asked me what’s the real difference, in plain terms? No technical jargon.

So here it is, I scored each feature out of 5 and compared Camp to SACEM, BMI, and YouTube CMS.

The closest one is YouTube CMS, but even that only scored 18/35, barely half of Camp’s perfect 35/35.

Camp outperforms them all, across IP registration, attribution & splits, royalty transparency, payment automation, fees, global access, and AI compatibility.

You just need to see this breakdown once to realize that this is what the future of IP looks like.
EVERY3.84%
ME-2.97%
IP-2.77%
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)